I am still messing about with Lumen5, a multimedia ‘presentation’ tool.
Here is a website I am translating into a video.
Here is the video I created using Lumen5.
This is a bit rough and amounts to a summary of the longer article above, a translation of the Howard Rheingold/Gardner Campbell conversation. My summing up is not profound, obviously. It is just my slow reading through another medium.
Here are some of my discoveries:
- I agree with the idea of having a personal learning cyberinfrastructure, but I hate that expression almost as much as I do personal learning algorithm. It is like I am laying interstate highways and sewers in my own mind. Too expensive and unsustainable. The transform here is the metaphor of infrastructure. I don’t like that any more than I do the constant references in Shakespeare to commerce.
- The domain may be my own, but the servers don’t belong to me. Shouldn’t we all be running our own servers, not renting somebody else’s? Are we really controlling our domains if someone else is hosting them? I think of this as a necessary compromise, but is it one that eventually corrupts the larger intent of the personal learning cybersomethingfication?
- Is this really just another means to think deeply and solve more effectively? Tools form us. Is the form they invoke one that is sustainable? Just got me thinking about the forthright fascism of Silicon Valley. The tools formed them, right?
There is more, but that is the beauty of slow reading (as opposed to close reading). I love how slow reading is like the thread picked at and ravelled. Close reading is like cutting with a scalpel. I could be wrong with those words, but that is how it feels.