I wanted to read this text closely and interact some, too, because it is seems so slickly abstract, so smooth. Credos and manifestos should not be so cool.
This lacks heat:
This is a little warmer:
And this is warmest of all (with a little tweak of the nose on the last slide):
And this makes it interactive:
And here is a hypothes.is link where it can also be interactive.
I am just floundering around here in the shallow seas of my understanding here, but I was hoping that my own efforts to “warm up” the text might be a way to make this very dry credo more accessible. I know it is very frail, but it is my own and I am trying. Maybe you would like to consider, too, making all your text a bit more cognitively accessible.