#Rhizo14: You Don’t Use Diigo?

Last night at our first unhangout Dave Cormier admitted that he hadn’t much cottoned to Diigo as a digital tool.  I think Jaap must’ve been surprised too because he responded in our Rhizo14 Diigo Group, a screenshot taken with Diigo below.

So now I am in Diigo, what do I do with Diigo- - Diigo Groups


I have rarely been able to get people to play with me on Diigo.  For example, in line with our topic this week of cheating I suggested to Jaap above that we find a post or article to share (via Diigo) and highlight and annotate it as our Diigo Group Rhizome14.  After we had done the group annotation we would extract them (one click with Diigo) and then write up an individual post where we would not attribute each others notes.  All for one and one for all.  When we had completed our individual posts we could then debrief and describe how it felt to ‘steal and cheat’.  (My guess is that it would feel pretty satisfying.)  Then we could mark up our work with color highlights to indicate who ‘owned’ what and see how that felt.

I live in constant fear that Diigo will go under.  It is a multi-tool of the mind.  The more I use it, the more I find uses for it.  Classic sign of a good tool. So…

I suggest we take a close look at Dave’s 2008 article on rhizomatics here and annotate it.   Then we can share our notes in common, write a post/poem/digital object/video/podcast in response, and then reflect separately (posts with twitter hashtag) and together (google hangout on air).  I am happy to provide resources and help to prime the pump here.

In the spirit of play, any givers, any takers?

Google Image Result for


#Rhizo14: Conformity and Iconoclasm

Dave Cormier’s intro to rhizo14 is full with translation.  Or rather it is full with the invitation to translate.  By that I mean he gives us room to begin to come to terms with “rhizomatic learning’.  Below I begin totranslate  a few of his choice remarks.

What happens if we let go of the conventional idea of a course directed from the top down?

I think that there are layers of letting go. There is the primary one Dave describes in the first paragraph–an aware sloughing off of the skin of coursework and curriculum and student and teacher and syllabus–the whole catastrophe. This is very hard unlearning. It requires a continuous monitoring of old metaphors and thinking in the light of …well, you know not what. The secondary letting go is individual baggage schema we each prize. We call it experience. It is an even greater unlearning. It is the matter of taking to heart  Coleridge’s  “willing suspension of disbelief” in ways that most of us are unwilling to risk. We say we can do it, but such work is perceived as dangerous. It requires a vulnerability to and presence of the immediate, unmediated now. That is some scary shit, compadre, I don’t mind saying. 

Trust the idea that people can come together to learn given the availability of an abundance of perspective, of information and of connection?

We are quite capable of doing this. We just have to remember what it was like to be an infant learning once more. Yeah, just open up a vein while you’re at it. I will try, but how do I try to do this? (No Yoda quotes in response, please.)  First, I have to accept as given that everyone has best intentions at heart. That means that I have to have the very best intentions myself. Not perfect, but the best that I can muster. Second, I have to bring immediate and vulnerable stuff to the table. That means no bullshit to the best of my ability. Or even better, I will be honest. For example, I am trying to be straightforward about my worries here and about what I expect of myself and what I expect of others. And I have to acknowledge that I might be wrong, yes, totally wrong about all or part of what I have already written.

Being resident in a particular field?

As a farmer, I am comfortable with the idea of working in a field. I acknowledge that there are pre-existent, but not largely predetermined paths. I understand that there is mystery here black swanand ‘unknown unknowns’ that can play out like Taleb’s black swans–complex, unbidden and unpredictable. As a farmer, I know that I am always working behind the arc of the future, a future that is as often as not curling and ready to collapse in gnarly waves crushing or carrying me forward into the present and then the past.

The class is made up of the collected paths chosen by all the students, shaped by my influence as an instructor and the impact of those external nodes they manage to contact.  Respond.

I am simultaneously the best conformist and worst iconoclast I know of. I have had plenty of practice at doing what I am told. Plenty. At the same time I have found it quite impossible to do so. For example, my wife and I homebirthed all of our children in a time and place where finding midwives was a challenge. There were no certified nurse midwives where we lived. In fact, even getting a physician to help with pre-natal care was problematic. We eventually found exceptional help on the margins. Our midwife had gotten her training and experience working in Texas with very poor folks exactly like us. Our midwife’s assistant opened up a world of knowledge that we didn’t know existed. Our firstborn had some interesting complications including a cord wrapped around the neck.  My point is simple–I suspect we only became iconoclasts because flickr-196686028-original.jpg (1440×1080)the issue is so personal and important, so important that we could not leave the work entirely to experts. Just like we could not leave our kids’ learning to the not so tender ministrations of schools, public or private, so we homeschooled. Just like we couldn’t leave our food and water and housing entirely to others. I am hoping to meet iconoclasts and conformists alike to help me meet this term with open hands.

Course starts January 14th

I must get past my personal iconoclasm to get to the community. This will be hard for me. I have some experience last summer working with some fabulous folks from the National Writing Project. They took me on and I learned how to national writing project - Google Searchconnect better. That community-centeredness is not foreign to me, but it has not always been the way I have gotten along best in the world. I love helping every Tom, Jane, and Harry, but I really don’t like institutional groups all that much. I shy away from Rotarians and churches alike. Rhizo14 will be part of my continuing effort to get out of my comfort zone. I will need all the help I can get.

[If you want to know more about iconoclasm in coding, check out Ted Neward’s Info Q keynote.]