Ivan Illich writing in the early 70’s foresaw the online education boom…and as you can read above, he feared it. He called it ‘insidious’ and ‘destructive’ and described it as a seductive way to condition workers. He said it was worse than industrial, compulsory schooling. Nailed it.
Would he have called social media out as well? Undoubtedly. They would have both been characterized as inhospitable and incongenial.
Efforts like #digciz take on a much larger role given this proven milieu. Whether you use the word ‘hospitality’ in this extended sense, as in struggling against the forces of distraction and splintering and for those of connection and conviviality, or not, we are clearly in a pitched battle that many of us aren’t even aware is going on around us.
The stakes are high. Clearly.
Translation: Some folks have asked for an elaboration of what I wrote above.
First text-image: Illich was a remarkably prescient social observer. This quote is taken from 1970 and reflects progressive educational critiques of American compulsory education. Illich also presages the world of technology solutionism so prevalent in Silicon Valley corporations today. He saw the Panopticon coming. He also saw this as much worse than the status quo. The word “insidious” evokes perfectly how, for example, social media has become ubiquitous and central to every aspect of our lives as well as to the purposes of the surveillance state.
Second text-image: Illich argues further that we are creating what I called and inhospitable political state. This gets to the idea that we are considering this week in #DigCiz, the centrality of hospitality as a countervailing force to the splintering and isolation created in the post-modern anti-convivial state.
I was trying to justify the serious effort by #DigCiz to amplify the importance of understanding and practicing digital citizenship. This week that was represented as digital hospitality.
Last text-image: The real stakes and the optimistic view that we can create a convivial state.



Permalink //
I dunno that we are all born together, naturally hospitable. Seems to me we are born into tribes, and those tribes don’t tend to get on very well.
Permalink //
Sarah, I share your concerns. However, for the 10-50,000 years humans have evolved the tools to communicate with more than the few people around you have been pretty limited. Then the Internet became available not more than 20 years ago for most of us, and all of a sudden, we could connect and share ideas with people anywhere in the world. The “tribe” changed from being geographically limited to becoming “idealistically” defined. We’re still in the very early stages of figuring out ways to make this work for the benefit of the majority and the planet, rather than just the few.
Permalink //
I posted a reflection on the #digciz and your posts at https://tutormentorexchange.wordpress.com/2017/06/17/joining-in-on-digciz-discussion/
Permalink //
I am reminded of The Daily Connect as a tangible, daily, constructive way to invite folks to welcome and honor the work and collaboration of others.
https://dailyconnector.wordpress.com/
Kevin
Permalink //
I’m really thinking hard about conviviality. This is a fruitful connection, thank you. I have been following Arthur Frank’s thoughts on generosity as another shift. Frank examines a tension between generosity and justice, and I think he’s prompted by similar concerns to Illich: with things as they are, how do we take practical steps to progress?
Permalink //
https://www.amazon.com/Tribe-Homecoming-Belonging-Sebastian-Junger/dp/1455566381
This book is a valuable part of the discussion.